IHSAA Drug Testing
Posted 15 January 2010 - 02:49 AM
I am not necessarily for this idea, but has it been discussed before? What could be some possible plans? What are some thoughts and opinions?
Just thought this might be a good discussion to get us through the doldrums until post season play.
I for one know I would have lost a few teammates on the gridiron my senior year, and know it can affect kid's decisions to play or not.
Once again I apologize if this upsets anyone it can be controversial, just trying to liven up the board.
Posted 15 January 2010 - 11:59 AM
It is a privilege to be involved in extracurricular activities, not a right.
Posted 15 January 2010 - 01:37 PM
Posted 15 January 2010 - 02:25 PM
While drug testing would be ideal for all levels of competition, to expect the IHSAA (or the schools themselves) to pay for extra (and sometimes unnecessary) testing on student-athletes is not only bad budgeting, but stupidity.
Posted 15 January 2010 - 02:33 PM
I am 100% for random drug testing. But what do you do when you find an athlete using? I like the idea of random testing. It sort of leaves it all up to the invisible know all to manifest illegal activity.
Well it would depend on the drug, I know that schools would find kids with Tobacco products in their system and that would result in a suspension of a few games according to the athletic handbook that school has. That is a good question such as what if marijuana is found or another illegal drug, is it their duty to report it to the authorities?
Posted 15 January 2010 - 05:06 PM
Posted 15 January 2010 - 05:15 PM
Posted 15 January 2010 - 05:23 PM
Posted 15 January 2010 - 08:28 PM
Drug testing is terrible and should be banned. America is supposed to be land of the free, and recreational drug use does not hurt anyone other than the user. We don't need big brother telling us what to do in every aspect of life.
Not sure about that one. Schools just try to step in and push some responsibility and consequences that kids may not get in their own household. Doesn't sound like a terrible thing.
But I think the random drug testing is the most common. But, the minimal amount of testing they do just makes it a waste. Your odds of getting caught are still very slim, and who knows if they're really "random"? What incentive does a school have to catch kids anyways? Probably gives that school a bad rep if anything. Either no testing, or test all athletes, IMO. If they want to play at the next level, they'll have to get used to it anyways.
Posted 20 January 2010 - 06:58 PM
Keep in mind that the NCAA is a multibillion dollar corporation essentially, and has the resources to do this. The IHSAA, however, doesn't have nearly the available resources. The schools also don't have the resources that a college or university has, and also faces more stringent monetary standards (a public school obviously can't raise tuition). Especially with the economy in a bind like it has been the past few years, it seems foolhardy for either the IHSAA or schools themselves to be putting the money into drug testing. Many schools in the state have enough problem in providing a quality education, so that money could better be spent improving the academic end.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users